Drugs and art have been
intertwined throughout history but do drugs facilitate art or they simply an
parasite to the creative mind. Herion and Cocaine are two drugs that have
intertwined their tendrils into the arts and created a mythology about their benefits.
Opium and later Heroin have been present in western culture for
eons, finding willing users in all branches of art. In the last couple
centuries cocaine became available and for most of that time was
praised as a cure for mental ailments and tool for the inquisitive artist.
I believe that neither drug is a benefit to the artist.
Highly creative people are unusual, their thinking is unusual,
and often times that unusual mind is plagued with problems as a result.
The use of drugs is usually an attempt to escapee pain
or unhappiness. So many artist have used drugs not because
it benefits them but because they are troubled to start with.
Heroin usage during the last half of the 20th
century plagued the arts community -
William Burroughs in literature, Kurt Cobain and Janis Joplin in
music , and Jean-Michael Basquiat in visual arts, just a
small sampling of artists that have had a run-ins with
Heroin. There has developed a mythology that Heroin
was responsible for their art. I contend that this is nonsense.
Their usage of heroin was because their creative
mind tormented them and they turned to Heroin to calm their
demons. Heroin is insidious, while it initialy calms, once
the addiction takes hold it causes great angst, requiring even more
heroin. These artists made great art despite their Heroin addiction, not
because of it. During the strongest clutch of Heroin the art produced
is usually muted and drab. An example of this is Kurt Cobain's
last album with Nirvana, In Utero. it lacks the edge and vibrancy of
his early works and foretells his ultimate downfall and death.
It is
clear that Heroin can coexist with great art creation though. Many renowned
artist have put out some of their best works during periods of heavy Heroin
usage. It's not until it completely consumes does it destroy the
artist's abilities. Cocaine on the other hand has
a detrimental effect on art at all stages of its usage. Initially Cocaine was
praised as a wonder drug that would lift the wworn-down and
conflicted mind. Sigmund Freud used cocaine heavily and urged
his patients to experiment with it. It was often the main ingredient in elixirs that
spread throughout the western world.
Cocaine has a distinct problem
of artificially boosting the users ego
and inflating perception of talents. This artificial boost
is actually detrimental when it comes to art. Great
art usually requires contemplation and doubt followed by refinements. If an artist believes at first pass they have created something brilliant their work ultimately suffers. Cocaine had a strangle hold on the music industry in the late 70's and throughout the 80's. I believe the explosion of musical ideas during the 60's was stifled in the following two decades by cocaine. As an example many of the hard rock groups of the 80's look at their cocaine addled works with disdain. Instead of refining their work they would do a first pass in the studio and immediately fall in love with it. One example is the Gallagher brothers of Oasis who in retrospect despise their cocaine effected work. Referring to the Oasis album Be Here Now Irish Times journalist Brian Boyd wrote: "Bloated and over-heated (much like the band themselves at the time), the album has all that dreadful braggadocio that is so characteristic of a cocaine user. Reflecting in 2007, Garry Mulholland admitted, "the fact that nothing could have lived up to the fevered expectations that surrounded its release doesn't change the facts. The third Oasis album is a loud, lumbering noise signifying nothing.
art usually requires contemplation and doubt followed by refinements. If an artist believes at first pass they have created something brilliant their work ultimately suffers. Cocaine had a strangle hold on the music industry in the late 70's and throughout the 80's. I believe the explosion of musical ideas during the 60's was stifled in the following two decades by cocaine. As an example many of the hard rock groups of the 80's look at their cocaine addled works with disdain. Instead of refining their work they would do a first pass in the studio and immediately fall in love with it. One example is the Gallagher brothers of Oasis who in retrospect despise their cocaine effected work. Referring to the Oasis album Be Here Now Irish Times journalist Brian Boyd wrote: "Bloated and over-heated (much like the band themselves at the time), the album has all that dreadful braggadocio that is so characteristic of a cocaine user. Reflecting in 2007, Garry Mulholland admitted, "the fact that nothing could have lived up to the fevered expectations that surrounded its release doesn't change the facts. The third Oasis album is a loud, lumbering noise signifying nothing.
Even though I believe that Cocaine and Heroin have not helped art, that doesn't
mean that all drugs are detrimental. Marijuana is frequently
been used to open up new angles of thought, usually in
silly ways, but sometimes the result is brilliant. Jazz musician of the
past and present have opened up new horizons in music by using Pot. Visual artists
also often report that marijuana has spurred new directions for their work. It
is possible that stronger psychedelics may aid
in creativity but I can't by any means say
I'm certain of that.
No comments:
Post a Comment